Xerxes - Rhian Lois and Andrew Watts |
In the case of Nicholas Hytner’s Xerxes, the task of reviving the production is made all the more
complex by the specific significance it had 29 years ago. At that time, Handel was still thought
of primarily as a religious composer, known mainly for his oratorios, The Messiah in particular. He also tended to be seen as a German
composer, even though he spent most of his working life in London and ended his
days an Englishman. The rediscovery
of Handel as an operatic composer in the 1980s, and his appropriation into the
canon of English opera, was largely a result of this iconic production, which
elides Handel’s music with an English translation in the style of Restoration
comedy (brilliantly done by Nick Hytner himself, often sounding close to
Congreve); locates the story in a version of Handel’s own London, with the
exotic world of the Vauxhall Pleasure Gardens inspiring the setting; and so
places Handel – quite literally, in the form of his statue from Vauxhall – at
the centre of the English national operatic stage. 1985 also marked Handel’s 300th birthday:
the whole undertaking was characterised by a sense of his admission to the
canon and commemoration as a national musical hero. And the production is so very “English”, with its tea and
cakes, its bowls and topiary, its redcoat soldiers and prim morality.
The England of 1985 was in a self-assertive mood, led by
Margaret Thatcher, whose Falklands campaign had recently marked a resurgence of
imperialist jingoism. During the
80s there was a distinct nostalgia for Empire: as Salman Rushdie noted, in the
aftermath of the Falklands we suddenly saw a rush of novels and TV series about
British India: Jewel in the Crown, The
Raj Quartet, David Lean’s film of A
Passage to India. At the V&A, the English galleries
were re-vitalised, with a central place being given to the statue of Handel
from the Vauxhall Pleasure Gardens.
Viewed from 2014, things look rather different. British imperialism, and English
assertiveness are no longer on the agenda. A few days after we opened, the last vestige of the Georgian
Empire teetered on the edge of disappearance, as Scotland voted on independence
(Xerxes, it’s intriguing to note, was
written just seven years before the 1745 Scots rebellion against the
Hanoverians). Thatcher said that
she would never talk to the IRA: this year, the Queen shook hands with Martin
McGuinness. Nicholas Hytner’s tenure
at the National Theatre has reflected a nation in doubt about its internal
identity and its place in the world: his first production as the National’s director
was a blistering Henry V, our
national epic deconstructed and questioned against the background of the
neo-imperialist invasion of Iraq.
At the current moment, I could not simply re-stage Nick’s Xerxes exactly as it was in 1985. It had to be a darker, more disturbing
piece; centring on a young King whose acquisitiveness towards Empire, objects
and women is both his drive and his downfall.
The politics of gender have also shifted dramatically in the
last 30 years. Xerxes remains a
gender-bending opera – but Boy George and Marilyn are no longer the key icons
of the queer movement. In the age
of Eddie Izzard, Grayson Perry and Conchita, the “man who sings like a woman”
could not simply be a self-pitying character, but becomes assertive and powerful. Elviro’s disguise offered new
possibilities around queer ambiguities, and some freshly minted jokes.
None of these shifts in perspective and tone undermined the
production – it was still very emphatically the classic piece of work that sits
at the centre of the ENO repertoire.
The hedge-clipper still popped up, the busts were smashed. Rather, my work in rehearsals was about
allowing the performers to live within that powerful framework, and in order
for them to live – for the performance to be “live” – they have to be fully
present in the current moment.
Without that immediate presence, that awareness of the current context,
a performance is dead.
That’s the same word ENO technical staff use when a show is
taken out of the repertoire: “It’s dead.” Nobody would want that to happen to Xerxes. After all, it’s only 29 years old. That’s far too young to die.
No comments:
Post a Comment